Look at this poor finblade
And same goes for the Finblade, it's a mythical and almost nothing sets it apart as a mythical,
except a few curves when you're looking at it from a certain angle WHILE there's no tidebringer effect on it.
I don't understand why other mythicals deserve a special treatment while Big Bad Bandana and Finblade do not.
Valve has based Dota 2 economy on cosmetics and if that doesn't matter, I don't know what does.
Cosmetics have a price, and people spend real money buying items to support Dota.
And they want something for their money, so if cosmetics aren't your thing - cool story,
but for others it does matter and Valve ought to show some respect for their supporters.
You can now shut up and go troll somewhere else.
Last edited by popovich; 06-07-2013 at 01:01 PM.
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64bit
CPU: Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD4850 512MB
RAM: 4GB DDR2 @ 800MHz
MB: ASUS P5KPL-AM SE
AV: ESET Smart Security v126.96.36.199
Check my My Steam profile for trade interests, etc.
well, it's better than the pathetic bladebiter, which looks worse and does nothing other than change loadout stance, despite being a 30 usd t-shirt item like the puck wings, jugg dragon sword etc.--all of which have nice animation changes.
honestly, finblade is still a decent looking sword with nice scroll work on it. there are lots of worse looking mythicals, no?