Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules

  • No flaming or derogatory remarks, directly or through insinuation.
  • No discussion, sharing or referencing illegal software such as hacks, keygen, cracks and pirated software.
  • No offensive contents, including but not limited to, racism, gore or pornography.
  • No excessive spam/meme, i.e. copious one liners in a short period of time, typing with all caps or posting meme responses (text/image).
  • No trolling, including but not limited to, flame incitation, user provocation or false information distribution.
  • No link spamming or signature advertisements for content not specific to Dota 2.
  • No Dota 2 key requests, sell, trade etc.
  • You may not create multiple accounts for any purpose, including ban evasion, unless expressly permitted by a moderator.

  • Please search before posting. One thread per issue. Do not create another thread if there is an existing one already.
  • Before posting anything, make sure you check out all sticky threads (e.g., this). Do not create new threads about closed ones.
  • It is extremely important that you post in correct forum section.

  • Balance discussion only in Misc.
  • All art related (such as hero model) feedbacks go to Art Feedback Forum.
  • All matchmaking feedback should go here: Matchmaking Feedback
  • All report/low priority issues should go here: Commend/Report/Ban Feedback
  • No specific workshop item feedback. These should go to workshop page of that item.
  • When posting in non-bugs section (such as this), use [Bugs], [Discussion] or [Suggestion] prefix in your thread name.



In case you object some action by a moderator, please contact him directly through PM and explain your concerns politely. If you are still unable to resolve the issue, contact an administrator. Do not drag these issues in public.



All rules are meant to augment common sense, please use them when not conflicted with aforementioned policies.
See more
See less

a suggestion for fixing MM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • a suggestion for fixing MM

    Now most of the community is displeased with the MM. It is obvious it needs some tweaks so here is my idea:

    Combine the MMR and Division system like this:

    There will be divisions but they wont be bound to skill at all. They will be bound to how many matches you have played. example: 1st div 0-200 matches , 2nd div 200-800 , 3rd div 800+

    Then you will implement the MMR into those divisions and make that everytime somebody advances a division their MMR resets.
    This will prevent smurfs by making smurfs play against each other.

    At the start there will be only 3 or 2 divisions with the growing player base the division number will also grow. and they'll be more specific.

    This is imo the best way to handle the matchmaking right now. It wont make 2k games people complain about getting matched with 20 wins people and it will also block smurfs(kinda).
    13
    This should happen, It might work!
    69.23%
    9
    MM is fine, get over it!
    30.77%
    4
    Last edited by cancnar; 07-29-2013, 02:31 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by cancnar View Post
    Now %50 of the community is displeased with the MM.
    Where did you obtain your statistical data? You could've just stated that you feel that a lot of people are dissatisfied with the current MM algorithm.

    Now, onto your actual thread: Divide based on matches played? I don't agree with that.

    Comment


    • #3
      It will also divide on skill. read it all . The current system will continue but with different pools. Like max 200 win pool . 200-800 wins pool. 800+ wins pool

      Comment


      • #4
        parties

        Comment


        • #5
          Parties will go to the place where the highest party member is. If highest party member has 1k wins you go to that pool.

          Comment


          • #6
            It was like that with the old MM and everyone complained. Now it puts the same parties agains each other for instance:

            team1: 3 + 1 + 1 (2000 mmr,1150mmr,1500mmr + 2 solo players)
            team2: 3 + 1 + 1 (2100 mmr, 1100mmr,1600mmr + 2 solo players)

            Now we have those 2 solo players complaining about that low skilled player on their team (but only if they lose the match )

            You cant solve the parties problem without people complaining.

            Comment


            • #7
              I dont know, I hate MM but I would be satisfied with the option to see my "hidden" rating.
              what's the deal with showing it, since you even hid wins you can hide that too.
              there is no logical reason to not show it, expect the fact that there might be no rating at all...
              Originally posted by katsaroulhs
              I see. You are on the reasons this game's community is considered "human waste".

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Fixmalve View Post
                I dont know, I hate MM but I would be satisfied with the option to see my "hidden" rating.
                what's the deal with showing it, since you even hid wins you can hide that too.
                there is no logical reason to not show it, expect the fact that there might be no rating at all...
                Yep. But this(the one i said) is better since the low skill guy will have his high skill bro to protect him.
                Last edited by cancnar; 07-29-2013, 02:44 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by puTTy View Post
                  It was like that with the old MM and everyone complained. Now it puts the same parties agains each other for instance:

                  team1: 3 + 1 + 1 (2000 mmr,1150mmr,1500mmr + 2 solo players)
                  team2: 3 + 1 + 1 (2100 mmr, 1100mmr,1600mmr + 2 solo players)

                  Now we have those 2 solo players complaining about that low skilled player on their team (but only if they lose the match )

                  You cant solve the parties problem without people complaining.
                  It is easy to solve a partys problem. How? Just dont try to solve it.

                  When i stack with a mate, which is not as good as i am i have no problems with playing against players which are on my skill.

                  so i am able to teach my mate how to become as good as me and what he has to do. So noone of the 8 other players is suffering because of my stack.

                  But you will never be able to handle all kindes of stacks. Dont even bother to fix it. People will just not stack with lower players anymore and find players on their own skill-level.

                  Unless you want to teach somebody how to become better - but you have to know the fact, that he might be not able to play porperly in this game.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    If the matchmaking suspects an account is a smurf, it should pair the account with other "suspected smurf" players.

                    Outcomes: No 2-win players in high-tier games, eliminating horrendous matches where their two wins were just coincidence. Smurfs have longer queue times and can't stomp as easily, which discourages smurfing and duplicate accounts.
                    Please help keep the forums clean by reporting rude or abusive posts!
                    Got a problem? PM me or another moderator!
                    Forum Rules

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      every common league i remember had a multi-account rule says following: ITS FUCKING FORBIDDEN!

                      -> same name as another account, same password, similiar e-mail adress, hints from other players (with proves), same ip-adress, etc. -> ban for lifetime on both accounts.

                      the best way to stop smurfing, or at least to scare the most part of ppl not to do it.

                      If you don't think smurfing should be stricly forbidden, say me one reasson why it should not.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X