Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Suggestion: Map control indicator

  1. #1
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012

    Suggestion: Map control indicator


    I posted an idea on about having a map control measurement implemented in dota2. This got some great comments and feedback so I figured I'd post it here as well.
    The idea is very basic, but maybe it's something that can be expanded on.

    I think that, considering the current metagame, mapcontrol is very important for the game. This isn't clearly depicted with the current gold and exp. graphs.
    Also, the casters usually forget to mention something as important as such.

    The idea of a map control graph based on vision / tower kills / time spent alive or dead / wards cleared, etcetera would be very hard to realise due to the variety of factors involved. So, maybe a grid with separate statistics could give the casters and viewers something more to play with. It also might give some more insight in what a team does to create map control. The idea of a 'heat map' was also suggested as a reply to my thread, so if this contributes to giving a clearer idea of who seems to be in control of the map, I'd support it.


    Original post:

  2. #2
    Basic Member Panter_d17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    SO basically a ball possession % could be nice to have

  3. #3
    Basic Member Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    hmm do you mean for spectatores? just like the gpm/epm graphs? could be a nice addition.

  4. #4
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Would be a really nice addition I think.

    Some thoughts what could be shown:
    -A big version of the minimap with an overlay that colors regions depending on control. Radiant's regions in green, Dire's regions in red and 'free' regions uncolored(or in grey).
    -An accompanying indicator showing some evaluation, who is more in control(maybe some kind of bar)
    -A graph showing how this indicator varied over time

    Thought on how to "calculate" control:
    -Discretize the map with a mesh of control-points
    -Control-points that can quickly be reached by heroes of a team are controled by this team:
    -> Area around heroes is controled
    -> Area around towers is controled because of TPs (maybe depending on how many heroes are carrying a TP?)
    -> If both teams claim some area, give control to the team with more heroes nearby(maybe some weighting depending on hero-strength)
    -> Maybe highlite area that is fought for: possible incoming fight
    -> Should factor in the vision of the team: No vision=no or lower control
    -Some lower amount of control-rating for area the team has vision of (maybe during the last 10-30 seconds)
    -> Creeps on the lanes give some control
    -> Wards give control
    -> More control if you have true sight(some base factor because of invis-rune and smokes, maybe higher influence if some heroes have invis)

    Some quick mockups:
    Control at the start of a game:
    Radiant T1 on bottom has fallen, Radiant ward at top rune, Someone farming on bottom, Dire ganking the farmer
    Last edited by Lord_Zera; 06-15-2012 at 02:40 PM.

  5. #5
    Basic Member moitoius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    +1 billion for support appreciation.
    Rules to be a good beta tester:
    1. Don't bring WC3 limitations to DOTA 2.
    2. Be an example. You are not here to play ALL games for fun. You are here to test so we can have a better game.
    3. Don't say that something is working as intended, unless it makes complete sense, not just because it was like DOTA 1.
    4. Being a better player than someone doesn't mean his argument is null-and-void.
    5. Use the search.
    Language Issues | Matchmaking Issues | Report/Commend Issues

  6. #6
    Basic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    @ viking, yes just for the spectators / casters, obviously

    @ lordzera, loving the ideas, someone at joindota mentioned a pushing bar to cater for either won or lost territory. If you gain ground with any sort of unit or ward, the bar pushes towards the opponent resulting in 55% versus 45% mapcontrol, for instance.
    It might still be tricky to actually realise this into the game, but as long as more statistics get recorded I'm happy :P With this I'm thinking wards placed or destroyed, time spent dead / alive. Things along those lines.

  7. #7
    Then IceFrog gave us Smoke of Deceit...
    Welcome to Left 4 Portal Strike of the Fortress 2: Episode 3.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts